U.S. House Member Calls for Violent Revolution

Posted under Randy Keating by RandyKeating on Sunday 29 March 2009 at 8:40 PM

People from the Great State of Minnesota Embarrassed Almost Daily

I could be wrong, but after the 2000 election, I don’t remember any prominent democratic commentators or officials calling for the violent overthrow of the Bush administration. This was of course an election Mr. Bush lost (but still won the Presidency). President Obama won the popular vote by 7%, and he received over double the electoral votes as Senator McCain. Yet, this has not stopped some on the political right from calling for violent revolution in the United States. From citizen revolts, military coups, to seceding from the Union, there has a been a chorus of calls for open treason. Notorious Minnesota representative Michelle Bachmann (pictured), launched to fame after calling for McCarthy-era investigations into the ‘anti-american’ members of congress in October 2008. Ms. Bachmann has outdone herself, this time calling for the people of the United States to be “armed and dangerous” in their opposition to the President’s agenda. Here are some of the more treasonous statements Ms. Bachmann made last week on several different ‘news’ outlets..

“At this point the American people - it’s like Thomas Jefferson said, a revolution every now and then is a good thing. We are at the point, Sean, of revolution. And by that, what I mean, an orderly revolution — where the people of this country wake up get up and make a decision that this is not going to happen on their watch. It won’t be our children and grandchildren that are in debt. It is we who are in debt, we who will be bankrupting this country, inside of ten years, if we don’t get a grip. And we can’t let the Democrats achieve their ends any longer.”

Any longer? Its been 2 months, and already she is ready to throw out the greatest example of the peaceful transition of power of any government throughout history? Ironically, a peaceful precedence set by Jefferson. Is she really ready to burn that shining city on a hill? Sadly, it appears so. She continued..

“Right now I’m a member of Congress. And I believe that my job here is to be a foreign correspondent, reporting from enemy lines. And people need to understand, this isn’t a game. This isn’t just a political talk show that’s happening right now. This is our very freedom, and we have 230 years, a continuous link of freedom that every generation has ceded to the next generation. This may be the time when that link breaks. And I’m going to do everything I can, I know you are, to make sure that we keep that link secure. We cannot allow that link to break, because as Reagan said, America is the last great hope of mankind..”

Only someone as tone deaf as Ms. Bachmann could sport these blinders. Does she not see the hypocrisy of talking about the great democratic tradition of America shortly after advocating that our process should be usurped by the minority? I mean come on, did she just say being a member of congress put her behind enemy lines? What happened to ‘Country First’? Sadly, for some, country has taken a backseat to ideology.

As an American, I am appalled by Representative Bachmann’s calls for the unilateral destruction of our great democracy. As a liberal, I’m loving ever minute of it, as Ms. Bachmann’s statements have come at a time when it seems the Republican party is struggling daily to make itself look even worse than it did just the day before. 19 page budget anyone? I suspect we won’t have to hear about this kook anymore after the 2010 election, but I’ve been wrong before.

Visit msnbc.com for Breaking News, World News, and News about the Economy


7 Comments »

  1. Comment by George Taylor — August 25, 2009 @ 11:38 PM

    You are obtuse, and in a few years this nation will be in the depths of a bloody revolt that will make the French Revolution look like a Sunday picnic. I look forward to it.

  2. Comment by RandyKeating — August 26, 2009 @ 9:26 AM

    I may not live to see the right’s ideas completely discredited, but I will be around to see that ridiculous statement proved false. Your comment has only made my case look stronger. The angry right is out of touch, uninformed, and lets face it, needless violent. I’m glad you support the destruction of our near 250 year old government, with irony lost, I’m sure you call yourself a patriot. You say its over the eroding of freedoms, but where were you doing the Bush years? On the bandwagon no doubt. Lets just be honest in our opposition, at least people would give you respect for the courage (if sadly ignorant) of you convictions. Thanks for reading.

  3. Comment by J.P. Arendt — August 26, 2009 @ 10:00 AM

    Both of you are off your rockers . . .

    We certainly shouldn’t be supporting “bloody revolt that will make the French Revolution look like a Sunday picnic.” That seems apparent — especially in those terms.

    See my response article to this to see why I think you’re off your rocker, Keating.

  4. Comment by RandyKeating — August 26, 2009 @ 10:09 AM

    Haha, I’ve read it. But, I still can’t support the destruction of our democracy, nor the rampant violence that would come with it. I will point out you said in said response “I believe that people are calling for revolution so loudly and so quickly because they see what I see. They see a man, an Administration and a Legislature that are intent on stripping the people of this nation of the freedoms that they have enjoyed for centuries.”
    Does this man see what you see? It is insane that someone as smart as yourself would be anywhere near supporting revolution. In a democracy, you won’t always get what you want, and violence isn’t the answer. This isn’t the playground, and we aren’t 12 year olds. 2012 isn’t far away, then you will have your chance to “get your country back”. Until then, the choice of the American people should be respected.

  5. Comment by J.P. Arendt — August 26, 2009 @ 10:57 AM

    I find it hard to believe that my words could be interpreted as supporting violent revolution. I do support the threat of it. The threat is part of what keeps us safe from oppressive government. However, I think I made it clear that we are far from the point of a true violent revolution and we should exhaust more peaceful means before considering revolution.

  6. Comment by RandyKeating — August 26, 2009 @ 11:12 AM

    “I believe that people are calling for revolution so loudly and so quickly because they see what I see.” — I don’t see how they could be interpreted as anything but, especially in the context of defending Mrs. Bachmann. I would never, and haven’t supported a revolution, the thought literally never crossed my mind during the Bush years.

    I do agree with you on one point, we aren’t near revolution, and we won’t have one. The truth is a vast majority of Americans are moderates, not complete wing-bats like Mr. Taylor.

  7. Comment by George Taylor — January 3, 2010 @ 2:18 AM

    I am far from right-wing.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

Copyright © 2010 Free Serfs. WP Theme created by Web Top.